Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction
Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction The recent Supreme Court ruling has brought a major development in the realm of Goods and Services Tax (GST), specifically related to input tax credit (ITC) for immovable property. For businesses in industries that invest heavily in building structures like malls, hotels, and warehouses, this judgment could mean a game-changing opportunity to claim ITC, which has previously been disallowed under Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act.
This article breaks down the ruling, its implications, and how businesses can potentially benefit from this decision by leveraging the “plant” exception and understanding the nuances of these sections.
Understanding the Provisions: Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act
Section 17(5)(c) and Section 17(5)(d) of the CGST Act collectively restrict the availability of input tax credit on the construction of immovable property, whether it is intended for personal or business use. Let’s break down these provisions in detail:
- Section 17(5)(c): Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction Disallows ITC for works contracts supplied for the construction of an immovable property (excluding plant and machinery) when supplied for own use, irrespective of whether such property is used for furtherance of business. Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction This means that ITC is not available for goods or services used to construct buildings unless they are directly related to a plant and machinery setup.
- Section 17(5)(d): Prohibits ITC on goods and services used for constructing immovable property (other than plant and machinery), including when the construction is done for own account, even if the immovable property is meant for business purposes. Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction The only exception here is plant and machinery, which means ITC is allowed for goods and services that form part of the “plant” setup.
Combined Impact: Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction Together, Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) create a major hurdle for businesses investing in the construction of immovable properties, as they severely limit the ability to claim ITC on construction-related expenses. Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction This has a direct impact on the cost structures of industries like real estate, hospitality, and warehousing.
Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction However, the Supreme Court ruling has provided a potential avenue for businesses to claim ITC by leveraging the “plant” exception, provided they meet certain criteria.
Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling: The “Functionality Test”
The Supreme Court, in its ruling, emphasized the importance of applying a functionality test to determine whether the immovable property in question qualifies as “plant” for the purpose of claiming ITC. If the construction of the building is essential and directly contributes to the business’s core function—such as leasing, renting, or other services—it could be classified as a plant, thereby allowing ITC claims under the exception to Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d).
What is the Functionality Test?
The functionality test is a practical evaluation to identify whether a building is just a structure or plays an integral role in delivering the business’s services. For example:
- A shopping mall constructed specifically to be leased to tenants might be seen as a “plant” since its construction is central to its business model.
- A hotel where the building itself is pivotal in providing hospitality services could potentially qualify as a plant.
- A warehouse used for renting storage space could be considered a plant, given its role in the business’s functionality.
Case-by-Case Determination
Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction The court highlighted that the determination of whether an immovable property qualifies as a plant should be made on a case-by-case basis. Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction There is no one-size-fits-all answer; each business must analyze its building’s functionality in the context of its operations.
Key Takeaways from the Ruling
- No Blanket Ban on ITC for Immovable Property: The ruling confirms that Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d) do not impose a blanket restriction on ITC for all immovable properties. If a property meets the functionality test, it can be treated as a plant, allowing for ITC claims.
- Potential for Cost Reduction: For businesses constructing buildings with the primary purpose of providing services (e.g., shopping malls, hotels, warehouses), this judgment could lead to significant cost savings by allowing ITC on materials and services used for construction.
- Role of Professional Analysis: Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction As each case needs to be evaluated independently, businesses should seek professional tax advice to analyze whether their buildings qualify as a plant based on the Supreme Court’s functionality test.
Case Analysis: Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. & Another
The case that sparked this discussion involved Safari Retreats Pvt. Ltd. and another petitioner. They constructed a shopping mall in Bhubaneswar with the intent of leasing it to tenants. Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction During the construction phase, they incurred expenses on goods and services and paid GST on these purchases.
However, when they sought to claim ITC on these expenses, the tax authorities denied the claim under Sections 17(5)(c) and 17(5)(d), arguing that it was an immovable property and, therefore, did not qualify for ITC. The petitioners challenged this decision, leading to the landmark Supreme Court ruling that clarified the applicability of the “plant” exception.
The Supreme Court ruled that the shopping mall, being central to their business model (leasing it to tenants), could qualify as a plant if the functionality test is satisfied, thus allowing the petitioners to claim ITC.
Industry Reactions: A Boon or a Bane?
The ruling has sparked considerable discussion among tax professionals and industry leaders.
- Sudipta Bhattacharjee, partner at Khaitan & Co, stated that the greatest positive from the ruling is that the court has held that there is no blanket restriction against input credit/set-off of GST costs. While determining whether a mall, hotel, jetty, or warehouse qualifies as a plant will remain a factual question, the judgment allows flexibility for businesses to present their case.
- Abhishek Jain, indirect tax head & partner at KPMG, opined that while the ruling upholds the constitutional validity of ITC restrictions on the construction of immovable property, it also opens the door for interpretations. Businesses could potentially benefit if they can establish their building’s functionality as a plant.
What This Means for Businesses: Next Steps
If you are a business that incurs substantial expenses on constructing immovable properties for commercial purposes, this ruling presents an opportunity to re-evaluate your GST position. Here’s what you should consider:
- Analyze the Functionality: Assess whether your building plays a crucial role in delivering your services.
- Seek Professional Advice: Tax consultants can help you determine if your property qualifies as a “plant” based on the Supreme Court’s ruling.
- Document Justifications: Maintain robust documentation that showcases how the property is central to your business operations.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s ruling on ITC for the construction of immovable property under the CGST Act has clarified a long-standing issue. By introducing the functionality test, the court has opened the possibility for certain businesses to claim ITC on buildings that are integral to their operations. This decision is poised to benefit industries like real estate, hospitality, and warehousing, where the building itself is crucial for business delivery.
While the exact impact will vary depending on each case, this ruling is a welcome move toward reducing tax costs and providing more clarity for GST compliance. Supreme Court Ruling on GST Input Tax Credit for Construction Businesses should proactively explore this opportunity and align their tax strategies accordingly.
For More Information : https://youtu.be/S_oJ1HL-pzs?si=GS61gg-ba_OrX6f9